{"id":4824,"date":"2025-11-11T17:16:02","date_gmt":"2025-11-11T15:16:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/?p=4824"},"modified":"2026-01-19T19:23:08","modified_gmt":"2026-01-19T17:23:08","slug":"math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/","title":{"rendered":"Math First, Buzzwords Later: Evaluating a Software Company\u2019s True AI Competence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>AI has become the new must-have label in the tech world. Scroll through LinkedIn or browse software company websites, and you\u2019ll see \u201cAI-powered,\u201d \u201cML-driven,\u201d and \u201cdata-centric\u201d plastered across every page. But behind the hype, many of these so-called <em>AI companies<\/em> don\u2019t actually build artificial intelligence\u2014they just rent people who do.<\/p>\n<p>Choosing a <a href=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/ai-ml-software-development\/\">partner for an AI, ML<\/a>, or data science project today is less about reading portfolios and more about reading between the lines. Do they have real engineers on board\u2014the kind who can talk about gradient descent, model drift, and data normalization\u2014or just account managers fluent in buzzwords? Do they design architectures, or do they resell someone else\u2019s expertise under a new logo?<\/p>\n<p>A genuine AI company starts with math, not marketing. It employs people who can reason in probabilities, understand the limits of data, and know when <em>not<\/em> to use a neural network. Before trusting a vendor with your next AI initiative, it\u2019s worth learning how to tell the difference between those who truly build intelligence\u2014and those who merely brand it.<\/p>\n<h2>The Mirage of \u201cAI Companies\u201d<\/h2>\n<p>Ever since ChatGPT went viral, nearly every development firm <a href=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/ai-powered-everything-when-tech-marketing-gets-lazy\/\">has declared itself an<em>AI company<\/em><\/a>. Some even changed their homepage overnight, replacing \u201cweb and mobile development\u201d with \u201cAI and data science solutions.\u201d The rebranding was instant\u2014the expertise was not.<\/p>\n<p>In reality, many of these firms don\u2019t have a single data scientist on staff. They rely on generic full-stack developers who can connect APIs and call that \u201cAI integration.\u201d Others work as middlemen\u2014brokering freelancers or outstaffing teams they barely know. When you ask about model architecture or evaluation metrics, the answers sound suspiciously like marketing copy.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s why the first step in assessing any potential AI partner isn\u2019t to admire their website but to <strong>look at who\u2019s actually doing the work<\/strong>. Because if your \u201cAI company\u201d is run entirely by sales managers and project coordinators\u2014without engineers who can read a confusion matrix\u2014you\u2019re not buying intelligence, you\u2019re buying theater.<\/p>\n<h2>Who\u2019s Actually on the Team?<\/h2>\n<p>Before you even look at case studies or price quotes, check the people behind the promises. Real AI work is math-heavy, data-dependent, and research-driven\u2014it can\u2019t be done by developers who \u201cpicked up TensorFlow last month.\u201d The team should include specialists with backgrounds in mathematics, statistics, or physics\u2014people who can explain why a model behaves a certain way, not just how to deploy it.<\/p>\n<p>Scan their LinkedIn profiles. Do you see data scientists, ML engineers, or research-oriented developers? Or is the company top-heavy with business development managers and delivery leads? A credible AI company has engineers in leadership roles\u2014CTOs and tech leads who write or review code, not just manage budgets.<\/p>\n<p>Watch for red flags:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Every key person has a \u201cgrowth\u201d or \u201csales\u201d title.<\/li>\n<li>No one mentions frameworks, models, or algorithms they\u2019ve worked with.<\/li>\n<li>Case studies read like sales brochures with no mention of data size, accuracy, or performance metrics.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>An authentic AI firm isn\u2019t afraid to show the technical side of its people. Because in this industry, expertise isn\u2019t something you outsource\u2014it\u2019s something you <em>employ<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2>Do They Ask the Right Questions?<\/h2>\n<p>A competent AI company doesn\u2019t rush to say \u201cyes.\u201d It starts by asking questions\u2014sometimes uncomfortable ones. Before a single line of code is written, the right partner wants to understand your <strong>data<\/strong>, your <strong>problem<\/strong>, and your <strong>goal<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ll ask what kind of data you have, how clean it is, and whether it\u2019s even suitable for training. They\u2019ll question if the problem you\u2019re trying to solve truly needs machine learning\u2014or if a simple rules-based system would do the job faster and cheaper. They\u2019ll dig into your business metrics and ask how success will be measured: accuracy, precision, recall, ROI?<\/p>\n<p>If the conversation feels more like an interview than a pitch, that\u2019s a good sign. Real AI professionals are skeptical by nature. They don\u2019t sell dreams\u2014they validate hypotheses.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, beware of vendors who promise \u201ca working model in two weeks\u201d before seeing a single dataset. When a company avoids talking about data quality or problem framing, it\u2019s not protecting your time\u2014it\u2019s hiding its ignorance. Because in AI, the smartest answer isn\u2019t always <em>yes<\/em>\u2014it\u2019s often <em>why?<\/em><\/p>\n<h2>Math Is Not Optional<\/h2>\n<p>Artificial intelligence isn\u2019t magic\u2014it\u2019s mathematics in motion. Behind every \u201csmart\u201d recommendation system or chatbot lies a set of equations, probabilities, and optimization algorithms that someone needs to actually understand. Without that foundation, \u201cAI development\u201d turns into guesswork with prettier dashboards.<\/p>\n<p>A genuine AI engineer speaks the language of gradients, loss functions, and regularization. They can explain what overfitting means, why a model drifts over time, and how to balance precision against recall. They don\u2019t rely on frameworks as black boxes\u2014they know what happens <em>inside<\/em> them.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s why a mathematical background isn\u2019t a bonus\u2014it\u2019s a prerequisite. You can teach a programmer how to use PyTorch, but you can\u2019t teach them to think statistically overnight. A company without strong mathematical culture may still deliver something that looks like AI\u2014but it won\u2019t <em>learn<\/em>, and it won\u2019t last.<\/p>\n<p>A developer writes code that works. An AI engineer writes models that <em>understand<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2>In-House vs. Outsourced Brains<\/h2>\n<p>You can\u2019t outsource intelligence. If a company\u2019s \u201cAI expertise\u201d disappears the moment a freelancer logs off, that company doesn\u2019t <em>have<\/em> expertise\u2014it rents it.<\/p>\n<p>Real AI capability must live inside the organization. That means engineers who experiment, publish, and iterate on their own datasets\u2014not subcontractors following a checklist. When a company truly builds machine learning systems, it develops an internal culture of curiosity: engineers challenge each other\u2019s assumptions, managers speak the language of metrics, and knowledge accumulates over time.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, outsourcing factories treat AI as another service line next to QA or UI design. They may deliver functional code, but not the intellectual capital that makes models evolve. Once the contract ends, so does the company\u2019s understanding of your product.<\/p>\n<p>So when you evaluate an AI vendor, ask not just <em>what they\u2019ve built<\/em>\u2014ask <em>who will stay after it\u2019s built.<\/em> Because long after the project is delivered, you\u2019ll need someone who remembers not only the data but the reasoning behind it.<\/p>\n<h2>Signals of a Real AI Partner<\/h2>\n<p>Once you\u2019ve seen the case studies and heard the pitch, it\u2019s time to check what truly matters\u2014the people you\u2019ll be dealing with. Not the logo, not the brand deck, but the <em>human profiles<\/em> behind your project. Because AI quality always reflects the team\u2019s intellectual depth.<\/p>\n<p>Start by looking beyond job titles. Many companies love to label their employees \u201cAI Engineers\u201d or \u201cData Scientists,\u201d but that title means little without the right background. Check what their education actually is: do they hold degrees in <strong>mathematics, statistics, computer science, or physics<\/strong>, or is it a short online certificate added after a general polytechnic diploma? There\u2019s nothing wrong with learning online\u2014but a few Coursera badges don\u2019t make someone capable of designing a production-ready ML model.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Good signs:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Formal education or research experience in applied math, statistics, or ML.<\/li>\n<li>Work that involves real-world data (not just \u201cAI-powered dashboards\u201d).<\/li>\n<li>Technical publications, Kaggle profiles, or GitHub repositories that show experimentation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Red flags:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Overly broad titles like \u201cAI Expert\u201d with no trace of academic or research foundation.<\/li>\n<li>Career paths that jump from business development to \u201cHead of AI.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Case studies where the person\u2019s role is limited to \u201cAI integration\u201d or \u201cautomation setup.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>When in doubt, ask to meet the actual engineers\u2014not just the delivery manager. A reliable company will gladly introduce its tech leads to discuss architecture, data pipelines, or model evaluation. Listen carefully to their language: do they talk about <strong>model validation, accuracy, and bias<\/strong>, or do they mostly repeat \u201ccutting-edge AI\u201d and \u201cpredictive insights\u201d? The difference between the two is the difference between science and sales.<\/p>\n<p>A practical step I often recommend: open LinkedIn, select a few people from the company, and simply read their activity. Are they sharing research, commenting on algorithms, experimenting with data? Or are they reposting motivational quotes and product announcements? It\u2019s the fastest way to see whether the company\u2019s AI competence is built on intellect\u2014or just intention.<\/p>\n<p>In short, don\u2019t let the corporate website convince you. Let the engineers do it.<\/p>\n<h2>Are They Building, or Just Brokering?<\/h2>\n<p>At the end of your evaluation, one question remains: does this company actually <em>build<\/em> intelligence\u2014or just <em>broker<\/em> it?<\/p>\n<p>A true AI partner owns its process from data to deployment. It can explain how models are trained, tuned, and validated. It keeps repositories, experiments, and metrics in-house. You\u2019ll hear its engineers speak in specifics\u2014about feature selection, model performance, and iteration cycles\u2014not in empty metaphors about \u201crevolutionizing industries.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Brokers, on the other hand, live off opacity. They talk about \u201cresources,\u201d \u201cdelivery speed,\u201d and \u201cscalable teams,\u201d but can\u2019t tell you who will write the code or whether that person will still be on the project next month. Their value lies in markup, not in mastery.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s a simple test: ask what happens after deployment. Will the same engineers monitor and retrain your model, or will they hand it off and disappear? Real AI firms treat models as living systems\u2014they evolve, measure drift, and retrain when data changes. Middlemen just ship a file and move to the next client.<\/p>\n<p>Also check whether the company has its <a href=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/category\/laboratory\/\">own internal projects<\/a> or research initiatives. Even small labs often experiment with open datasets or publish proofs of concept. It shows curiosity and confidence\u2014the two qualities you want in a long-term partner.<\/p>\n<p>Because in the end, AI is not a commodity. It\u2019s an accumulation of reasoning, mathematics, and experience. If the company doesn\u2019t nurture those internally, you\u2019re not hiring a development team\u2014you\u2019re renting a contact list.<\/p>\n<p><strong>If they don\u2019t have mathematicians in the office, they don\u2019t have AI in the product.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>How Real Intelligence Looks in Business<\/h2>\n<p>Choosing an AI or data science partner isn\u2019t about who has the flashiest case studies or the biggest sales team\u2014it\u2019s about who truly <em>understands intelligence<\/em>. Real expertise shows up in the details: the questions they ask, the people they hire, the math they can explain without slides.<\/p>\n<p>A credible AI company doesn\u2019t chase every project; it filters them. It challenges vague ideas, defines measurable outcomes, and refuses to build models on weak data. It invests in its own people\u2014mathematicians, statisticians, and researchers who don\u2019t just follow frameworks but question them.<\/p>\n<p>When evaluating vendors, ignore the noise of \u201cinnovation\u201d and \u201cdisruption.\u201d Look for reasoning, not rhetoric. Ask for the dataset, the architecture, the metrics, and the failure rate. Ask who will retrain the model after six months\u2014and who will understand <em>why<\/em> it failed if it does.<\/p>\n<p>Because the difference between a real AI company and a pretender isn\u2019t just in technology\u2014it\u2019s in the culture of thinking. Real AI starts where the buzzwords end\u2014with people who still believe that numbers tell the truth.<\/p>\n<h3>Real vs. Pretend AI Companies: How to Tell the Difference<\/h3>\n\n<table id=\"tablepress-91\" class=\"tablepress tablepress-id-91\">\n<thead>\n<tr class=\"row-1\">\n\t<th class=\"column-1\">What to Check<\/th><th class=\"column-2\">What Real AI Companies Do<\/th><th class=\"column-3\">Red Flags<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody class=\"row-striping row-hover\">\n<tr class=\"row-2\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Team Composition<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Employs data scientists and ML engineers with math, statistics, or physics backgrounds; has engineers in leadership roles.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Mostly business developers and project managers; no clear technical leadership.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-3\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Questions They Ask<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Investigates data quality, problem definition, and success metrics before starting.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Promises quick delivery without reviewing datasets or goals.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-4\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Mathematical Expertise<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Understands model internals, gradients, bias, and accuracy measures.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Treats frameworks as black boxes; can\u2019t explain why models behave as they do.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-5\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">In-House Competence<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Has internal engineers, R&amp;D culture, and accumulated know-how.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Relies entirely on freelancers or subcontractors; knowledge disappears after delivery.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-6\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Education &amp; Profiles<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Team members with strong academic or research background, active on GitHub or Kaggle.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Generic titles like \u201cAI Expert,\u201d short online certificates, or no visible tech activity.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-7\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Project Ownership<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Monitors and retrains models after deployment; sees AI as a continuous process.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Hands off project once delivered; no support for iteration or improvement.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-8\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Company Culture<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">Curious, transparent, math-driven environment where reasoning matters more than hype.<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">Focuses on sales buzzwords \u2014 \u201cinnovative,\u201d \u201ccutting-edge,\u201d \u201ctransformative\u201d \u2014 without substance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<!-- #tablepress-91 from cache -->\n<div class=\"laTeaser\">\n<div class=\"laTeaser__content laTeaser__dark\">\n<div class=\"laTeaser__img\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"laTeaser__txt\">\n<h3 class=\"laTeaser__h3\">AI competence starts with real tech.<\/h3>\n<p>If a company can\u2019t prove its logic, its AI isn\u2019t real. LaSoft builds solid mobile apps, clean dashboards, and reliable backend systems based on rigorous engineering \u2014 not hype.<\/p>\n<div class=\"laTeaser__lnk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/contact\/\">Let\u2019s talk<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"AI has become the new must-have label in the tech world. Scroll through LinkedIn or browse software company websites, and you\u2019ll see \u201cAI-powered,\u201d \u201cML-driven,\u201d and \u201cdata-centric\u201d plastered across every page. But behind the hype, many of these so-called AI companies don\u2019t actually build artificial intelligence\u2014they just rent people who do.","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":4826,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,232],"tags":[175,272,216,25],"coauthors":[160],"class_list":["post-4824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-emerging-technologies","category-management","tag-ai","tag-data-science","tag-ml","tag-project-management"],"yoast_head":"<title>Math First, Buzzwords Later: Evaluating a Software Company\u2019s True AI Competence<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Learn how to evaluate an AI, ML, or data science development company by checking its real expertise.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Math First, Buzzwords Later: Evaluating a Software Company\u2019s True AI Competence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Learn how to evaluate an AI, ML, or data science development company by checking its real expertise.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Software Development Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/lasoftians\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mr.sheludko\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-11T15:16:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-19T17:23:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-ml-company-700x367.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"367\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Mykhailo Sheludko\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-ml-company.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/msheludko\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@LaSoftAgency\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Mykhailo Sheludko\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Math First, Buzzwords Later: Evaluating a Software Company\u2019s True AI Competence","description":"Learn how to evaluate an AI, ML, or data science development company by checking its real expertise.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Math First, Buzzwords Later: Evaluating a Software Company\u2019s True AI Competence","og_description":"Learn how to evaluate an AI, ML, or data science development company by checking its real expertise.","og_url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/","og_site_name":"Software Development Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/lasoftians\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mr.sheludko","article_published_time":"2025-11-11T15:16:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-19T17:23:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":700,"height":367,"url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-ml-company-700x367.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Mykhailo Sheludko","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_image":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-ml-company.png","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/msheludko","twitter_site":"@LaSoftAgency","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Mykhailo Sheludko","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/"},"author":{"name":"Mykhailo Sheludko","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/921fa7985a2d733e68efb012aab962ea"},"headline":"Math First, Buzzwords Later: Evaluating a Software Company\u2019s True AI Competence","datePublished":"2025-11-11T15:16:02+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-19T17:23:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/"},"wordCount":1945,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-sales.png","keywords":["AI","data science","ML","Project Management"],"articleSection":["Emerging Technologies","IT Management"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/","url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/","name":"Math First, Buzzwords Later: Evaluating a Software Company\u2019s True AI Competence","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-sales.png","datePublished":"2025-11-11T15:16:02+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-19T17:23:08+00:00","description":"Learn how to evaluate an AI, ML, or data science development company by checking its real expertise.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/math-first-buzzwords-later-evaluating-a-software-companys-true-ai-competence\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-sales.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/ai-sales.png","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"ai sales"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/","name":"Software Development Blog","description":"Insightful Analysis of IT Markets and Emerging Technologies","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#organization","name":"LaSoft","url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/lasoft.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/lasoft.jpg","width":1200,"height":628,"caption":"LaSoft"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/lasoftians\/","https:\/\/x.com\/LaSoftAgency","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lasoftians\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/la'soft-","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCGiINdBnqPoBpK1WaCEZMHQ\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/921fa7985a2d733e68efb012aab962ea","name":"Mykhailo Sheludko","description":"Mykhailo Sheludko is a Ukrainian marketing analyst, writer, and researcher. He works at LaSoft, a software development company, where he shapes the firm\u2019s marketing strategy, analytics, and content direction\u2014especially in fields like AI &amp; ML, Transport and Logistics, MarTech, AgriTech, and Telecom. He has 10+ years of experience in marketing, with a background in journalism and public relations, and actively produces blog articles, strategic audits, ad campaigns, and visual content for LaSoft and other digital projects.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/mr.sheludko","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/sheludko\/","https:\/\/x.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/msheludko","Kyiv, Ukraine"],"url":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/author\/mykhailo-sheludko\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4824"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4824\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5192,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4824\/revisions\/5192"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4824"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lasoft.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}